• News Tech Today
  • Monday, September 14, 2009

    Apple announces new iTunes, iPods

    In 2001 Apple introduced the iPod: a 5 gigabyte music player that allowed for "1,000 songs in your pocket." Today, more than 200 million iPods have been sold. And Sunday, Apple, once again, updated its iPod line.

    In typical Apple fashion, the company held a invitation-only event to show off sales numbers and its new products.

    Apple Chief Executive Officer, Steve Jobs took the stage after taking a leave of absence to deal with health issues. Jobs introduced a new iPod Touch and iPhone software update as well as a new iTunes version.

    The biggest feature in the new iPod firmware is the ability to purchase pre-made ringtones. And the new iTunes offers a radically re-designed store with a cleaner look. iTunes will also allow for what Apple calls "home sharing," which enables the user to share his or her iTunes library with up to 5 computers in his/her home. Both the new software update and the new iTunes can be downloaded for free.


    Phil Schiller, one of Apple's vice presidents, announced the arrival of new iPod touches. Apple claims that the new touches are 50 percent faster than the previous model. This increased speed will allow for smoother game play. Besides the speed increase, cheaper prices, and larger storage, the new iPod Touch is basically the same as its predecessor. The new iPod Touch starts at $199.


    Both iPod Classic and the iPod Shuffle received a storage boost.

    The iPod Shuffle will also be available in new colors: black, silver, blue, green, and pink. And a special edition Shuffle that is polished stainless steel will be available. The Nanos start at $149.

    The new iPod Nano has been changed the most, offering up new colors, a larger screen, FM radio and a video camera built in. For more information on the new products announced by Apple, check out their Web site.

    By Tyler Wells

    Hands-On With Bing Visual Search

    In the seemingly never-ending attempt to overtake Google (NSDQ:GOOG) as leader of the search engines, Microsoft (NSDQ:MSFT) released its latest salvo into beta Monday. Called Visual Search, the new feature lends itself very nicely to Microsoft's insistence of calling Bing a "decision engine."

    As one might expect, Visual Search is comprised of galleries, each an array of images pertaining to the subject being searched or, more appropriately, researched. Since the galleries have to be manually assembled, there are only a limited number currently available. Microsoft claims the number will continue to grow.

    Clicking on a gallery brings up an image for each piece of related data. For instance, clicking on the Dog Breed gallery displays 161 pictures of dogs, initially sorted alphabetically. Hovering over each image temporarily fills in the Bing search field with the breed's name. Below the search field, a list of pertinent information is displayed. In this case -- size, coat length, exercise needs, etc.

    As with other Bing searches, the list can be narrowed down with the use of filters listed along the left frame. Clicking on the image brings up a standard Bing results page.

    Our initial testing proved Visual Search to work well. About the only caveat is that to use it, the Silverlight 3.0 plug-in (Microsoft's answer to Adobe Flash) must be installed.

    Since the galleries must be prepopulated by humans, we don't see this feature really turning Bing into the Google killer Microsoft might be looking for it to become. But to help make decisions, especially before purchasing something, Visual Search really makes it easier to find what you're looking for.

    When the feature goes live, performing a search in Bing will offer a link to the respective gallery when one exists. Until then, the beta can be found at http://www.bing.com/visualsearch.

    By Brian Sheinberg

    Google Tries to Enhance News Browsing With Fast Flip

    Google is developing a product called Fast Flip that aims to make it simpler and faster to browse through news articles on the Web, a process that the company finds is cumbersome and discourages people from reading more online.

    Fast Flip was expected to go live late Monday at the Google Labs Web site, where the company features early stage product prototypes. As such, Fast Flip could change significantly, become temporarily unavailable or even disappear without notice.

    Fast Flip lets readers glance at pages and browse through them quickly without having to wait for multiple page elements to load, which can significantly slow the rendering of articles, especially if they have multimedia content, according to Google.

    The idea is to try to replicate online the ease with which people flip through the pages of print magazines and newspapers in the offline world. This could motivate people to read more online, which Google argues will help publishers attract more readers and increase their revenue.

    However, when users click on a Fast Flip link, they will be taken to the corresponding publisher's Web site, where the Google technology will not be on hand to display the page more quickly.

    People who try out Fast Flip will find articles from 36 publishers, including The New York Times, the Washington Post, Salon and Newsweek, as well as contextually relevant ads. For now, Fast Flip will only feature content from the publishers Google has been working with to develop the technology, but it plans to add more in the future.

    Fast Flip will also feature a search engine and let users share content. Based on their reading choices, users will see suggestions for other articles they might find interesting.

    Change Browsing Habits?

    Richard Gingras, CEO of the Salon Media Group, expects Fast Flip to shed light on how user behavior might change if people can browse through online material more quickly.

    "On the Web you can go page to page, but it takes five to 10 seconds between pages, so it's not as 'browseable' an experience as with print, where you flip through and scan a lot of things very quickly," he said.

    "This is one experiment, and it'll be interesting to see what we learn," he added.

    Gingras believes that Fast Flip will not only lead people to read more online, but also add a higher degree of serendipity to their experience through the unexpected discovery of interesting articles they didn't initially set out to find.

    This element of serendipity is one that Google has been interested in adding to Google News, according to Gingras, who before becoming Salon CEO was an independent adviser to Google about news and media from late 2007 until late 2008.

    Salon also has its own initiatives to make it easier for its readers to find more of its articles. The publication will soon start to beta test a Web site redesign focused partly on organizing content by topics, so readers can scan articles about the same subject.

    "Any publisher these days has to be looking at how to create interesting units of content and facilitate the use and access of that content in as many ways as the audience is willing to consume them," Gingras said.

    Google: Work in Progress


    At this point, Google isn't making any tools available for external developers to integrate Fast Flip with their Web sites and applications.

    "Launching Google Fast Flip in Labs lets us learn from our users and our publishing partners so we can keep exploring ways to display news and help publishers make more money from their content," a spokesman for Google said via e-mail.

    "We know that Google Fast Flip isn't perfect, and there's a chance it may never become a full-blown Google product. But we think there are some interesting ideas behind it," he added.

    In addition to working on regular PC browsers, the Fast Flip Web site adapts itself when reached from iPhone and Android-based mobile devices, letting users flip pages via a touch-screen interface. Google was due to unveil Fast Flip at the TechCrunch 50 Conference in San Francisco.

    By Juan Carlos Perez

    Sunday, September 13, 2009

    Facebook Is Going for Some Twitter Sensibility

    September 14, 2009

    Like a balding hipster who imitates a young trendsetter’s style, Facebook is updating itself to look a lot more like Twitter.

    Unlike Facebook, where friends mutually agree to let one another into their online lives, Twitter lets people share updates and links with anyone who cares to read them.

    That has turned Twitter into a tool for people to peer into the collective mind and see what people are talking about in real time. It is also a tool for businesses to reach customers and monitor what their customers are saying about them.

    Facebook seems to be very interested in those features. Since last fall, when Facebook tried and failed to acquire Twitter, it has been slowly introducing features that mimic Twitter.

    Last week, Facebook added two new, Twitter-like features. Users can now “tag” friends or companies that they mention in status updates, and they can use a pared-down version of the site called Facebook Lite that resembles Twitter’s stream of status updates.

    Meredith Chin, a Facebook spokeswoman, played down the changes. “We’ve been making iterations to our product over time to reflect the rapid evolution of how people share information online,” she said.

    But others see another force at work. “Twitter envy: Facebook has it, absolutely,” said Jeremiah Owyang, a social media consultant at the Altimeter Group, which advises businesses on using new technologies. “Facebook absolutely recognizes that Twitter is a threat, and they’re doing what they can to replicate the features before Twitter gets mainstream adoption.”

    To tag another Facebook member in a status update, users type the @ symbol before the friend’s name. The @ symbol is a convention that Twitter users started. In response, Twitter added a section on its site where people can see any tweets that mention them. The mentions are hyperlinked so others could click on them to see the subject’s profile page.

    Andrew Huang, a product manager at Facebook, said it is “a common Internet mechanism,” and he expects Facebook members to use it more for storytelling than Twitter users do.

    Facebook has long allowed people to tag friends in pictures, but until now, not in status updates. When people are tagged, they get notified by e-mail, the update appears on their profile pages and their names are hyperlinked to their pages.

    Mr. Huang, who developed the new tagging feature, said it would enable users “to talk about their real-world connections” and “interact with each other more.” It will also enable people and businesses to monitor what others are saying about them on the site, which was previously much harder to do. That has been one of Twitter’s vital selling points to businesses.

    Adoption by businesses is a revenue-generating opportunity for both companies. Twitter, which does not yet have any significant revenue, has said that it will soon introduce features that help businesses interact with customers. Facebook offers businesses special pages and the option to buy ads to show to users who like similar companies.

    Luna Park, a chain of three restaurants in San Francisco and Los Angeles, uses both Facebook and Twitter to send out promotions. Chuck Meyer, Luna Park’s general manager in San Francisco, said Facebook is more useful because the restaurant can post photos and longer updates. But he said customers use Twitter more because they think of it as a place to follow businesses and Facebook as a place to chat with friends. Luna Park has about 1,580 fans on Facebook and 2,350 followers on Twitter.

    Mr. Meyer is pleased that Facebook added a tagging feature similar to Twitter’s because when people mention Luna Park, their friends can go to Luna Park’s profile page with a single click and Luna Park will get an alert. The new feature will also lure people to the site with e-mail notifications that they have been tagged.

    “A lot of companies are envious of Twitter because people spend a lot more time there, and this allows Facebook to do the same thing — it gives them another opportunity to get people to come back to the site,” said Jason Keath, a social media consultant in Charlotte, N.C.

    The second new feature, Facebook Lite, is meant for people with very slow Internet connections or new users who want an introduction to the core features of the site, Ms. Chin said. But it might also appeal to veteran Facebook users who like the simplicity of Twitter.

    Facebook Lite is essentially a stream of updates, like Twitter. It includes photos and comments, which are not available on Twitter, but disposes of other distracting sections that clutter the traditional Facebook homepage.

    Facebook has made other Twitter-like changes. In March, it updated users’ homepages to show the full stream of updates from all friends in real time, instead of just the updates selected by an algorithm. And last month, Facebook allowed brands and celebrities to send status updates directly to Twitter without visiting Twitter’s site. Twitter users can send tweets to Facebook.

    Twitter says it is happy to share with Facebook. “Twitter continues to reduce friction between many services,” said Biz Stone, a founder. “Our services are complementary to mobile networks, social networks, search engines, software platforms, television networks and maybe a few other areas we haven’t thought of yet.”

    No matter how many features they share, it is unlikely that Facebook will make Twitter unnecessary for its users — or vice versa, Mr. Keath said. “I don’t think that divide is going to close soon. There’s going to be certain aspects where Facebook can compete or maybe take over Twitter, but over all, they are safe in their niches.”
    By CLAIRE CAIN MILLER

    At Last: IEEE Approves 802.11n Wi-Fi Standard After 7 Years

    September 13

    People who criticize companies like Microsoft and Apple for pursuing their own de facto standards instead of working through formal standards bodies might consider the long, strange history of Wi-Fi. The IEEE has finally ratified the latest longer range, higher speed version of the wireless standard. The move came seven years after the process began and more than two years after an all-but-final draft was approved and companies started deploying 802.11n gear.

    In fact, Wi-Fi has succeeded, and has improved steadily, only because hardware and software companies have regularly given up of the pokey IEEE standards-setting process and have forged ahead on their own. There have been occasional issues of incompatibility, but it has been better than the alternative of waiting forever.

    Apple and Lucent launched Wi-Fi products back in the 1990s before the IEEE ratified the original 802.11b standard. Even the Wi-Fi Alliance, a trade group more conservative than the hardware makers, has certified new standards long before the IEEE formally adopted them.

    by Stephen Wildstrom

    3rd gen iPod touch contains an 802.11n-capable WiFi chip

    The fantastic folks from iFixit have got their hands on a brand new, hot out of the factory 3rd gen iPod touch. So what do they do with it? Tear it apart!

    So, what did they discover? Well, two interesting things.

    * First, the 3rd gen iPod touch is home to a Broadcom BCM4329FKUBG wireless chip. According to the Broadcom spec sheet, this chip supports 802.11n.


    There also a Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR and a FM receiver and transmitter packed into that chip
    What’s extra interesting is that not even the iPhone 3GS has support for 802.11n.

    * There also seems to be room in the iPod touch for an iPod nano style camera.

    By now you should know how we’ll get 802.11n support … at some point in the future Apple will release an update, but because it’ll be “adding a new feature” it’ll claim that we have to pay $10 for the update, even though primarily it’ll consist of bug fixes, minor improvements and more integration with the iTunes Store. It sucks, but its the way it is.

    Great work iFixit!

    by Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

    Google ordered to ID authors of emails to York University

    13 sep 2009

    TORONTO -- York University has won court orders requiring Google Inc. and Canada's two largest telecommunications companies to reveal the identities of the anonymous authors of contentious emails that accused the school's president of academic fraud.

    The university took the extraordinary measures after an email was circulated alleging that president Mamdouh Shoukri "perpetrated an outrageous fraud" when publicly touting the appointment of a new dean.

    In January, the school announced its hiring of Martin Singer as its inaugural dean of the new Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies, said to be the largest faculty in the country. The announcement called Prof. Singer a "renowned scholar of Chinese history" and quoted the president as saying: "York University is fortunate to have attracted such a strong scholar and administrator."

    A week later, an email in the name of a group called York Faculty Concerned About the Future of York University was sent using a Google Gmail account to members of the York community challenging the statements regarding Prof. Singer's scholarly output. "Lying about scholarly credentials is the gravest offence," the email said before calling for the president's resignation and a new search for a dean.

    York obtained a court order in May compelling Google to turn over Internet Protocol addresses associated with the Gmail account. Google identified Bell Canada and Rogers Communications as the relevant Internet Service Providers.

    Last month, York sought similar orders compelling Bell and Rogers to disclose the contact information of the customers who accessed the account, a motion that went unopposed by the telecom giants. This week, Justice George R. Strathy of Ontario Superior Court released his reasons for granting the orders, saying it was a reasonable balance between protecting freedom of speech and protection from libel.

    David Noble, an outspoken professor at York, was listed in the email as a contact person. In an interview yesterday, he denounced York's legal moves as "a fishing expedition" that was unnecessary since the allegations raised were shown to be correct by statements from both the president and the new dean. "I think they are trying to create a chill among faculty," he said.

    "They are spending enormous sums, for what? I think they are just desperate to find out who is involved." He said his colleagues sought anonymity because they are "afraid of reprisals."

    Will McDowell, a lawyer for the university, defended the action. "Academics enjoy quite extensive latitude in what they say and what they write and what they research at Canadian universities but I would say this about any of us: The right of free speech is not unlimited," he said.

    "What was said is quite damaging to the institution."

    The school now has the identities of five or six people who allegedly had access to the Gmail account. Justice Strathy said the information is only to be used for the purpose of commencing litigation.

    by Adrian Humphreys

    InfoWorld releases new cloud computing 'deep dive' report

    13 sep 2009

    InfoWorld released today the fourth entry in its "Deep Dive" series of special PDF reports, covering the emerging area of cloud computing. InfoWorld, a Web-based publication devoted to emerging technology and hands-on business tech expertise, had previously released "Deep Dive" reports on Windows 7, enterprise iPhone, and next-gen mobile devices, as well as a quick-start guide to Windows 7.

    The new report feature an exclusive excerpt from SOA and cloud expert David Linthicum's "Cloud Computing and SOA Convergence in Your Enterprise: A Step-by-Step Guide" book, and offers several in-depth articles that demystify the cloud computing concept, which suffers from confusion caused by the excesses of vendor hype, and that provide deployment and selection advice based hands-on testing from InfoWorld's independent Test Center.

    More information on InfoWorld's "Deep Dive" reports and other editorial reports. InfoWorld also has a set of interactive tools for users, including a tracker of real-world Windows usage and configuration trends and an iPhone apps finder for business and IT apps.

    By InfoWorld staff

    Amazon: Google Book deal would lead to “perpetual exploitation of copyrighted works”

    sep 13 2009

    In a recent court document filed in federal court in Manhattan, the online retail bigwig Amazon.com reiterated that the Google Books settlement would lead to the “perpetual exploitation of millions of copyrighted works,” and that the contentious issue of establishing rules for digitized books should be the Congress’ dispensation, not Google’s.

    Putting forth legal arguments to substantiate its opposition of Google’s settlement with some US publishers and authors, the Seattle-based online retailer said that the deal “invades the prerogatives of Congress and attempts to legislate a private solution to a problem that can only truly be solved with across-the-board changes to the copyright law that affect everyone.”

    Other than Amazon, Google rivals Microsoft and Yahoo too have vehemently opposed the litigious book settlement. Even the country top copyright official, Marybeth Peters, recently expressed the concern that parts of the deal are “fundamentally at odds with the law,” and challenge Congress’ ability to govern copyrights.

    However, defending the deal, Google spokesman Gabriel Stricker contended that the agreement – whereby Google will make a $125 million payment and set up a Book Rights Registry to recompense copyright owners – is “non-exclusive”, and its approval by the court would make millions of books accessible to the US book-lovers.

    The final decision on the deal lies with US District Judge Denny Chin, who would review it at the scheduled October 7 hearing in New York.
    by Amandeep Dhaliwal